Your AI wrote it. Nobody read it.
A senior developer reads the code you shipped and works the running app, looking for the things generated code gets wrong. You get the findings and the pull request that fixes them. Our first two reviews each found a critical account takeover.
What a review covers
- A senior developer reads your codeAvailable now
Not a scanner run and summarised. Someone experienced reads the code you shipped and works the running app, looking for the things generated code gets wrong.
- Account takeover and auth logicAvailable now
Broken authentication is the flaw we find most and the one automated tools miss most, because it lives in logic rather than in a known-bad pattern. Both of our first two reviews found a critical one.
- The pull request that fixes itAvailable now
Findings come with the code that resolves them, opened as a PR against your repo. You review and merge rather than reading a report and starting work.
- Findings you can act onAvailable now
Each issue with its severity, how to reproduce it, and what it would cost you if someone found it first. No CVSS scores without context.
- Security Reviewed sealAvailable now
A badge that names the commit it covers and the date it was reviewed, linking to a page you do not control. It expires, so it can never claim more than it knows.
- Free automated scanComing soon
Connect a repo and get the top issues by severity before you pay anything. Coming.
- Continuous scanningComing soon
Every push checked automatically between reviews, so a regression surfaces in hours rather than at the next quarter. Coming.
- Supply chain verificationComing soon
Dependency contamination, lockfile integrity, and install scripts, as a seal of its own. Coming.
How a review works
- 01
You give us access
A repo, the URL it runs at, and written permission to test it. We prove you control the domain before any traffic is sent, because a signature from someone who does not own the target protects nobody.
- 02
Someone reads it
A senior developer goes through the code and works the running app. Broken authentication is what we find most, and it is what scanners miss most, because it lives in logic rather than in a known-bad pattern.
- 03
You get a PR, not a PDF
Findings arrive with the code that resolves them, opened against your repo. Review and merge. Then a seal that names the reviewed commit and the date.
Account takeover. Broken access control. Exposed secrets. Injection. Dependency contamination.
Findings come with the fix, not just the diagnosis.
Frequently asked questions
A senior developer reads your code and works the running app, then opens a pull request against your repo fixing what we found. You also get the findings written up with how to reproduce each one, and a seal naming the commit we reviewed.